老刘博客
本篇文章老刘博客带来火数云新乡机房测评，测试配置是CPU：2核，内存：4G，带宽：5Mbps，硬盘：50G(NVME硬盘)，附火数云优惠码立减10元！
说测评之前先分享下官方给本站读者带来的10元新购通用代金券，以下券码均仅限使用一次，用完失效：
- DJQ7623ba06a9af409
- DJQebf143bc84804bc
- DJQ1c49315f94334ee
- DJQafa143644d8946f
- DJQ134f67d9f546407
- DJQc04a3ce4ac8d497
- DJQ62ba52d9731240a
- DJQ62891da820a945b
- DJQd20e7db65d5742f
- DJQ8d4b8b9f19054c9
- DJQe87269ce6ff445e
- DJQfe656d6ff1504b3
- DJQ6bde4833a493493
- DJQeb78c72521c1416
- DJQcd2946fb15664b8
- DJQ9a11a92a05364ee
- DJQd05c20bdb2ec4ee
- DJQ0d8793bec37c47c
- DJQf064ae61184a46e
- DJQa865aef52a2e4f1
云服务器HCS （HuoCloud Compute Service）是火数云基于独有的云计算技术打造的可弹型伸缩的高性能计算服务，助您降低IT成本，提升运维效率，使您更专注于核心业务创新。火数云新乡机房是BGP多线线路，如图：
火数云新乡机房测试配置：CPU：2核内存：4G带宽：5Mbps 硬盘：50G(NVME硬盘)，月付价格见上图，购买时可使用上面的立减10元优惠码。
火数云服务器购买入口：控制台 – 火数云 (huocloud.com)
火数云年终盛典活动入口：最新活动-火数云-领先的云服务器、服务器租用托管、知识产权注册提供商 (huocloud.com)
火数云HCS站长工具ping测试
火数云HCS丢包率测试
火数云HCS宝塔跑分测试
云服务器上传速度
火数云服务器下载速度
火数云服务器SuperBench脚本测试
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Superbench.sh -- https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.7
Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU Model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU Cores : 2 Cores 2399.996 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 16384 KB
OS : CentOS 7.6.1810 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64
Total Space : 3.4 GB / 50.0 GB
Total RAM : 282 MB / 3789 MB (1728 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 0 MB
Uptime : 0 days 2 hour 52 min
Load Average : 0.00, 0.02, 0.05
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS4837, China Unicom Henan Province network
Organization : Henan xinfeijinxin Computer Co., Ltd
Location : Zhengzhou, China / CN
Region : Henan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 817 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 920 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 952 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 896.3 MB/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 5.14 Mbit/s 49.93 Mbit/s 43.35 ms
Nanjing 5G CT 5.00 Mbit/s 49.66 Mbit/s 13.90 ms
Hefei 5G CT 5.00 Mbit/s 48.94 Mbit/s 15.94 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT 4.63 Mbit/s 42.76 Mbit/s 26.00 ms
TianJin 5G CU 4.98 Mbit/s 49.07 Mbit/s 11.92 ms
Shanghai 5G CU 5.03 Mbit/s 49.35 Mbit/s 22.12 ms
Wuxi 5G CM 4.99 Mbit/s 48.99 Mbit/s 24.47 ms
Nanjing 5G CM 3.58 Mbit/s 50.60 Mbit/s 25.49 ms
Hefei 5G CM 5.03 Mbit/s 53.10 Mbit/s 23.61 ms
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Finished in : 3 min 54 sec
Timestamp : 2022-01-08 19:16:42 GMT+8
Results : ./superbench.log
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Share result:
· https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/da01d196-05c4-48ff-b3ef-e9fa107f24ca
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6Gz4j8MRHG/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
火数云服务器UnixBench脚本测试
Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 08 2022 20:26:48 - 20:55:10
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 64263154.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8963.5 MWIPS (10.6 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5323.9 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 994191.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 248598.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3198473.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1687453.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 271667.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18203.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8444.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1145.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1563669.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 64263154.9 5506.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8963.5 1629.7
Execl Throughput 43.0 5323.9 1238.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 994191.3 2510.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 248598.8 1502.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3198473.6 5514.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1687453.4 1356.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 271667.2 679.2
Process Creation 126.0 18203.1 1444.7
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8444.9 1991.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1145.5 1909.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1563669.5 1042.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1807.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
